From GOPbloggers

Our Democrats, and especially their leftwing core, seems bent on following their beliefs right up to and over the electoral cliff. They really don't know (or at least so rigidly refuse to admit to facts that its as if they don't know) that leftwing political ideology has been rejected utterly by the American people. Its been examined, observed in action, discussed thoroughly and found to be flawed; and deeply flawed at that. The American people have no affinity for people who demand the release of cop-killers, consider abortion a positive moral good, want to judicially impose gay marriage, think the terrorists have a point or two about the United States and think that the broad mass of Americans are ignorant, hate-filled bigots too stupid to know whats good for them.

That really does sort of sum it up, doesn't it?

I really would like to see the Democratic Party collapse entirely, cut free the far left activists that are currently pinning them down (let them form their own socialist party or something) and rise from the ashes with a more moderate message... a larger tent.

I think the Republican Party is doing a decent enough job encompassing a large variety of us. The Far Right may call the moderate middle RINOs, but we still feel at home here. I have a feeling that the new Republicans that we are generating are even more center-centric. Some day I hope that even the Log Cabin Republicans feel that they have a home here as well. Personally, I don't have a problem with Gay people who cherish conservative values (I don't necessarily equate conservative values with religious values, I only recognize that religion is a strong supporter of conservative values)

I think that a non-polarized two party syystem is the most effective, with a large core group in the middle forming alliances across party lines to get essential legislation passed, with the national mood swinging liberal or conservative as our prevailing culture desires.

It has been over a month since Senator John Kerry promised to sign a Standard Form 180 on MEET THE PRESS. This form would authorize historians and partisans alike to have full access to his military records... answering once and for all...

Did Senator Kerry receive a Less Than Honorable discharge, only later to be commuted to Honorable by President Jimmy Carter?

Mark Alexander of the National Review Online speculates as much.

Among Kerry's released records is a 1977 cover letter from Jimmy Carter's Navy Secretary, W. Graham Claytor. What is revealing about this document is that it notes Kerry's original discharge was subject to review by a "board of officers" -- yet no such review should be necessary for an Honorable Discharge.

The review was conducted in accordance with "Title 10, U.S. Code Section 1162 and 1163," which pertains to grounds for involuntary separation from military service.

As many Vietnam veterans who served their nation with dignity and honor will recall, Jimmy Carter's first official act as president was the signing of Executive Order 4483 --less than an hour after his inauguration on 21 January 1977. EO 4483 provided general amnesty for draft evaders, war protesters and other offenders of that era. Its corresponding, and equally dubious, DoD directive took effect in March of 1977, expanding that amnesty to include separation from military service by other than honorable discharges. The DoD specified an appeal procedure whereby discharges could be reviewed on an individual basis to determine whether the status of a particular discharge could be revised.

Having lost his first bid for Congress, Kerry no doubt decided that his political future would be brighter as a war hero rather than a war protestor. While there are several categories of discharges beneath honorable, including general, medical, bad conduct and other than honorable, it is very likely that Kerry's discharge was dishonorable.

Supporting this assertion is the fact that Kerry had all his medals mysteriously reinstated in 1985. He claims that he lost his medal certificates (perhaps these are what he famously threw over that Capitol fence in protest), but when a military officer is subject to a Dishonorable Discharge, in addition to the loss of pay benefits and allowances, all medals and honors are revoked. In any case, it would be a cinch for John Kerry to refute our claim by simply signing that Standard Form 180. But he won't. Nor will hard-hitting journalists like Katie Couric and Dr. Phil press him on this issue.

Thus, while Kerry can correctly say -- thanks to Jimmy Carter -- that he received an Honorable Discharge, he could also say with equal precision that he received "other than honorable discharge." His activities as a leader of Vietnam Veterans Against the War were, indeed, forgiven by Carter's EO 4483 and the subsequent DoD directive.

Why don't you contact Senator Kerry and let him know that you would like him to put an end to these questions, and sign his Standard Form 180?

Hat Tip to Linda at Something... and Half of Something

UPDATE: Just a link back to an entry I wrote back in October of 2004:
"Dishonorable? OTH? Will we ever know?"