« Keeping Your eye on the State Department |
Main
| Kerry's Standard Form 180 »
E-Mail this Article
|
Nothing is Ever Straightforward: Evaluating Iraq (Part 1) I confess. The more I try to understand what is happening in the Middle East, the more I wish I never started digging. It makes my head, heart and soul ache. I'll be the first to admit that I am something of an idealist. I'm far from perfect, but I try to aim high in everything I do; even when you don't succeed it seems to make for better caliber mistakes... that, and you don't ever really lose sight of what you are trying to accomplish in the first place. Making your ideals work in reality requires a certain amount of faith; I referred to it above when I talked about not losing sight of what you are trying to accomplish. ...but where is that line in the sand where faith becomes naivety? I had a hard time discerning that line this evening as I dug through the dusty corners of the internet seeking full disclosure about a story I had recently read concerning liberal activists donating money to Fallujah. My virtual reconnaissance led me to as good a starting place as any to begin this debriefing... Lance Corporal Jesus A. Suarez del Solar. LCPL del Solar was killed on March 27, 2003, one of the first casualties in Operation Iraqi Freedom. From the Camp Pendleton Scout: Since his son's death, Fernando Suarez del Solar has become a prominent touring spokesperson and activist for groups like Global Exchange and Code Pink. Because of this, most of the blogs and online newspapers that I found while seeking information on this story were clearly partisan; some even came with advice on how to effectively protest the war in Iraq. As I recount this tale (which does end in Fallujah, I assure you) I will of course select the bits and pieces that strike me as the most likely and believable. "In late March, two Marine officers arrived at the Suarez home. Their son had died on the battlefield of a gunshot wound to the head, the officers told the Suarezes. Later, a newspaper reporter called to say Jesus had been killed by "friendly fire." A television reporter called with a third story." "Suarez said ABC officials contacted him, told him they had information regarding his son's death and paid for his flight to Iraq, where they would tell him what happened to his son. ABC correspondent Bob Woodruff, who was embedded with Suarez's son's unit, had video footage of Jesus in Iraq a week before he died. In a video shown at the presentation, Woodruff revealed from his notes that his son died from a U.S. artillery shell." I have not found that particular description, "told him that they had information regarding his son's death and paid for his flight to Iraq, where they would tell him what happened to his son" anywhere else, but I certainly don't like the way it was phrased. It does seem that this "video presentation" by Bob Woodruff of ABC has been shown a number of times in a number of locations. I don't like the manipulative overtones I see here. "Bob Woodruff was with Jesus when the boy died. He says Jesus was killed a day after a military unit sprinkled cluster bombs in an area the Marines were to patrol..." "...The military unit laying the bombs didn't mention their work to the Marines. Jesus, acting as Scout, trampled one of these bombs. He was badly, but not mortally, injured although he was bleeding heavily from a head wound. Several attempts were made to call in a medievac helicopter but the Marines' radio malfunctioned. The helicopter arrived two hours after the explosion and Jesus died in the helicopter on his way to medical care." I'm not sure that Bob Woodruff was actually with LCPL de Solar when he died, or if the Cluster Bombs were added to the story later. As you saw above, the Western Front article has him citing an artillery shell. Here is another: A USA Today study has found that the U.S. dropped or fired nearly 11,000 cluster bombs or cluster weapons on Iraq during the invasion and Britain dropped 2,000 more. It is unknown how many Iraqis died from cluster bombs. One estimate puts the total at 370. And the attacks left behind thousands of unexploded bomblets. At least eight U.S. soldiers and an unknown number of Iraqis have been killed by unexploded bomblets. What exactly is a Cluster Bomb, and why would we have been using them just outside of Bagdhad at that time? "Cluster bombs were developed in order to improve the efficiency of aerial attacks, particularly against "soft" targets like personnel. Single bombs are less useful for this purpose because they cover a smaller area (known as a "footprint" in military parlance), and their effectiveness is dependent on the accuracy of the bomb's drop. A cluster bomb functions like a shotgun, covering a wider area with a spread of miniature bombs. It appears to me, at least, that this could have been a likely scenario - especially if we were trying to ensure that the area in question was clear of armor or vehicles. Perhaps the Artillery Shell and Cluster Bomb comments all refer to the ICM shells referenced above. I don't, however, react with the same kind of suspicion that Mr. Suarez del Solar does now, especially after visiting Iraq with Global Exchange and Code Pink. "At the hospitals he saw youngsters dying from the lack of medicine and learned that a number of others had been killed picking up unexploded cluster bombs or when trying to hand them in to U.S. soldiers." Looking into these accusations, I found the following comments issuing a persuasive rebuttal. "Now as to the previous poster, he states that 'Only 20 percent (of cluster munitions) exploded.' I've researched it, and the military says 95% (minimum) reliability, the ICRC reports a 75% reliability in Kuwait and Kosovo. Strike one. The only comment that I can add is that the area outside of the city where LCPL del Solar died was not a populated civilian area. I think that the Geneva Convention argument is pretty well closed, and I think that they were after straggler armor/vehicles from the day before. His numbers are really off as well. Where is he getting a lot of his information from? "He became an anti-war activist after his 20-year-old son died on March 27 when he stepped on an unexploded U.S. cluster bomblet south of Baghdad. There are other strong indications that Mr. Suarez del Solar has been swayed by the opinions of his new friends in the anti-war movement. "Jesus Suarez Del Solar wanted to fight in Iraq to prevent an attack on the United States. That sounds like most of the military people that I know. "When my son left on February 5, 2003, to go to Iraq, he said, 'I don't believe in this war, but I'm a Marine and I'm going to go do my job. I'm going to try to help the children there have a better life.'" That doesn't sound like anyone I know in the military at all, but it does sound like the MSM did here at home and just like his father does now. Perhaps my circles are limited, but most of the people I knew in the military had long felt that Iraq was a job left undone. The sanctions that were supposed to be temporary had lasted over a decade, and they weren't working. In fact, the sanctions had killed more innocent civilians than were lost in the war. We were eager to finish it. "The military is supposed to respect life and serve the American Constitution. This war doesn't respect life or serve the Constitution. It serves only the people in power. Now we have moved beyond what was originally a grieving father's difficulty in dealing with what he saw was the unjust death of his son... and has graduated to parroting the spoon-fed lines of the liberal left. What respect I did have for Mr Solar's grief is beginning to wane. For the record, the public high school that I attended (Coral Gables Senior High) was an affluent one. We had a Lacrosse team, a Water Polo Team and Jazzercise classes. There were Porsches and BMW's in the student parking lot. James Michener taught a creative writing class there when I was a senior. ...and it was only through the steadfast persistence of the local Navy Recruiting office that I joined the military just before the Gulf War. I had never even considered the military as an option; just like Jesus, it sounded like a good deal. Mr Suarez del Solar, I'd wager there are recruiters even in Beverly Hills. I'd also wager that what you call "an abusive system" is what most people in the military "being abused" would call an excellent opportunity. Your own son thought so, a citizen of Mexico here on a green card with little wealth and dreams of becoming a DEA agent. He was a Hero. "Basic facts of Fernando Suarez del Solar: He immigrated his family to the United States 9 years ago when son Jesus was 14 years old from Tijuana (not as rumored for the sole purpose of Jesus joining the U.S. Marines). At 18, Jesus voluntarily joined the Marines. The Marines say he was a good Marine. He died in the Iraq invasion a Mexican citizen because father Fernando never secured citizenship for himself or his family..." TO BE CONTINUED IN PART TWO More discussions on the war in Iraq, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and the efforts of Global Exchange and Code Pink to bring aid and comfort to the people of Fallujah. Posted by Michael at February 27, 2005 12:12 AM |
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.i-magery.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/97
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Nothing is Ever Straightforward: Evaluating Iraq (Part 1):
|
Travels from Mudville Gazette Found via trackbacks on open blog posts: Recognize the location? Is it Baghdad? Beirut? Nope - France during WWI. Found an amazing collection of color photos from WWI via this post on So Random. Follow the link to the full... Tracked on March 1, 2005 01:52 PM |
|
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
|